(bug) PHP 4.3.11 Not allowed

[Breaker]

It will cost you $175 to upgrade to a vB4 forum license, after the presale event

[Breaker]

because they want you to buy the suite, or decide not to and have to pay a lot more than normal for the forum later, what they are forgetting is people just won't upgrade ...

[Breaker]

You can use that license for as long as you want, you just can't renew for updates anymore without upgrading to vB4.... which sucks...

[Breaker]

Do you trust a currently unseen product enough to drop $130 on it? That is the real question...

[Breaker]

The forum upgrade will be avilable after the pre-sale offer, at a price of $175

You have access to all versions released before your license expired, 3.8.1 was released 27th Jan

[Breaker]

I too would like to know, that isn't that bad of a price...

[Breaker]

This seems far from a delayed update, $160 converted to GBP then having tax added is about £92, seems the system is taxing twice

[Breaker]

heh, nice mockup style :P...

[Breaker]

it comes to the point of stupidity. #1. football is crap, #2. he's crap at football, #3 WTF?!?!?!?!!!?

[Breaker]

i don't, it's clunky and slow. and it keeps ignoring some of my damn videos

got my 360 a few months back, playing through gears (gow = God of War), dead rising, viva pinata and ridge racer...

[Breaker]

in vBulletin Options in ACP under "Cookies and HTTP Header Options" you can change the session timeout (in secs)

[Breaker]

seems to be as intended, not allowed to use custom avatars and so they have to be put onto no avatar so they can choose their own.

[Breaker]

i dont know, but some of the messages are just funny

[Breaker]

took you a while to find it aswell :P...

[Breaker]

you set this yourself through the infraction group thing

[Breaker]

PHP 4.3.11 is a more recent version of PHP than 4.3.3, yet it is blocked by the installer, any method to bypass?

[Breaker]

heh, on submitting me answer I thought they had added AJAX.... guess it was just a stupidly fast reload :P...

[Breaker]

someone has already said that in the last few days

anyway, these clean urls seem fun, haven't worked out the layout of the id's and stuff yet... but you can call any php page by using...

[Breaker]

could it not be dependant on what the admin states in the T&C, could i not state that all posts made by a user are owned by them blah blah blah... or the opposite?

[Breaker]

hmmm.... multi-quote from different threads :P...