First it was $30 annual renewal, then $60.
And the way this works out, under the old renewal price ($60) it would cost you $90 for 18 months ($60 + $30) (with free ticket support). Now, we will be paying $195 for 18 months (without ticket support). That's more than double the price, and is missing the ticket support. So pay more, get less. That's backwards. It should be pay less, get more.
So someone tell me how vBulletin is doing us a favor? They are trying to make it look like "hey, you get vBulletin for the entire long life of 4.x for a one time fee and no annual renewals" when really VB5 will be here in record-time compared to previous versions. In order for the $195 price tag to be a deal, would mean VB5 would have to be over 3 years away.
I just thought I'd point this out, because a lot of people are really thinking this new "no annual renewals" will save them money, when in reality it will cost you 2x as much.
In what way have they NOT screwed us over? In what way have these changes brought upon any positive changes?
And the way this works out, under the old renewal price ($60) it would cost you $90 for 18 months ($60 + $30) (with free ticket support). Now, we will be paying $195 for 18 months (without ticket support). That's more than double the price, and is missing the ticket support. So pay more, get less. That's backwards. It should be pay less, get more.
So someone tell me how vBulletin is doing us a favor? They are trying to make it look like "hey, you get vBulletin for the entire long life of 4.x for a one time fee and no annual renewals" when really VB5 will be here in record-time compared to previous versions. In order for the $195 price tag to be a deal, would mean VB5 would have to be over 3 years away.
I just thought I'd point this out, because a lot of people are really thinking this new "no annual renewals" will save them money, when in reality it will cost you 2x as much.
In what way have they NOT screwed us over? In what way have these changes brought upon any positive changes?

Comment