Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Conflict between vBulletin's license and GPL packages/plugins?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Conflict between vBulletin's license and GPL packages/plugins?

    This is a question I posted at vbulletin.org (http://www.vbulletin.org/forum/showthread.php?t=126548). But given that this is vBulletin's official forum, I may get an answer from the owners of the software.

    (Moderators: please move this thread to the appropriate forum if needed).

    My question is regarding licensing issues between vBulletin + bridges + CMS/Blog packages (or any GPL package).

    I am writing a 'bridge' between vBulletin and MediaWiki (http://www.vbulletin.org/forum/showthread.php?t=123273). While doing so, I started researching portals to use in my site (www.luxurywiki.com), and found that some CMS packages are licensed under GPL (e.g. Drupal, E107) and some under LGPL (e.g. Bitweaver).

    So, I tried to learn about this and find the implications of writing an 'extension' (plugin) for MediaWiki, which is licensed under the GPL, that would integrate MediaWiki with vBulletin. vBulletin is a commercial software package, copyrighted by Jelsoft, and licensed on an individual basis to the users who purchase such license (this is my understanding, BTW, I own several licenses of vB).

    In this FAQ about GPL: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLAndPlugins; it is stated that if I write an extension (plugin) for MediaWiki, I have to release it under the GPL due to the fact that MW is loading the plugin dynamically and the plugin uses other MW's internal data structure. (I intended to GPL my plugin).

    But, according to the GPL, a GPL licensed piece of code cannot rely on another program/library that is not free (GPL or compatible license).

    So, I find myself puzzled by the whole situation. MW is GPL, any plugin I write has to be GPL, but this in turn cannot rely on non-GPL proprietary software (i.e. vBulletin).

    Am I misinterpreting something here? Does this make any sense? If any of you have any idea please chime in.

    (BTW, as you may surmise, I am not a lawyer )
    Blog: elfmage.nuhit.com/blog/
    Home: www.nuhit.com

  • #2
    To prevent flame wars between customers with different opinions I will close this thread for now. I will point this out to our business manager for review.

    Note: Jelsoft is a commercial company with copyright protected source code. This means NO code can be reproduced, check the license agreement.

    Comment


    • #3
      After a short discussion with some of our staff it is clear that we can agree on this:

      You are free to license the plugin any way you wish; as long as it does not contain any vBulletin source code.

      Comment

      Related Topics

      Collapse

      Working...
      X