Another one...
lmno820
email : [email protected]
IP : 59.173.226.84
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Spam bots defeat Recaptcha.
Collapse
X
-
I had a look at the serverlogs.
One thing, that is common to all bot registrations is, that the are quite different to "normal" registrations.
Here are two bot-registrations from the serverlogs:
61.173.43.67 - - [23/May/2008:05:56:30 +0200] "GET /register.php?do=signup HTTP/1.1" 200 17751 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" "http://forum.computerbetrug.de"
61.173.43.67 - - [23/May/2008:05:56:31 +0200] "POST /register.php?do=register HTTP/1.1" 200 23960 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" "http://forum.computerbetrug.de/register.php?do=signup"
61.173.43.67 - - [23/May/2008:05:56:32 +0200] "GET /image.php?type=hv&hash=e04cd6d3adbcc6d2cf83f0b9caa47c56 HTTP/1.1" 200 14536 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" "http://forum.computerbetrug.de/register.php?do=signup"
61.173.43.67 - - [23/May/2008:05:57:28 +0200] "POST /register.php?do=addmember HTTP/1.1" 200 15480 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" "http://forum.computerbetrug.de/register.php?do=register"
61.173.43.67 - - [23/May/2008:06:42:23 +0200] "GET /register.php?a=act&u=10848&i=74842131 HTTP/1.1" 200 24245 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Windows XP 5.1; MSIE 6)" "-"
218.240.13.108 - - [23/May/2008:07:22:34 +0200] "GET /register.php?do=signup HTTP/1.1" 200 17646 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" "http://forum.computerbetrug.de"
218.240.13.108 - - [23/May/2008:07:22:37 +0200] "POST /register.php?do=register HTTP/1.1" 200 23855 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" "http://forum.computerbetrug.de/register.php?do=signup"
218.240.13.108 - - [23/May/2008:07:22:39 +0200] "GET /image.php?type=hv&hash=a6c3342ed881d2d11e9fa8890a5c6ca8 HTTP/1.1" 200 17554 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" "http://forum.computerbetrug.de/register.php?do=signup"
218.240.13.108 - - [23/May/2008:07:25:53 +0200] "POST /register.php?do=addmember HTTP/1.1" 200 15370 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" "http://forum.computerbetrug.de/register.php?do=register"
218.240.13.108 - - [23/May/2008:07:26:16 +0200] "GET /register.php?a=act&u=10849&i=7684469 HTTP/1.1" 200 24248 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Windows XP 5.1; MSIE 6)" "-"
218.240.13.108 - - [23/May/2008:16:45:12 +0200] "GET /register.php?do=signup HTTP/1.1" 200 17646 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" "http://forum.computerbetrug.de"
218.240.13.108 - - [23/May/2008:16:45:17 +0200] "POST /register.php?do=register HTTP/1.1" 200 23855 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" "http://forum.computerbetrug.de/register.php?do=signup"
218.240.13.108 - - [23/May/2008:16:45:25 +0200] "GET /image.php?type=hv&hash=7e2605968c62524a0e9614933758f977 HTTP/1.1" 200 11875 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" "http://forum.computerbetrug.de/register.php?do=signup"
218.240.13.108 - - [23/May/2008:16:45:33 +0200] "POST /register.php?do=addmember HTTP/1.1" 200 24670 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" "http://forum.computerbetrug.de/register.php?do=register"
218.240.13.108 - - [23/May/2008:16:45:39 +0200] "GET /profile.php?do=editsignature HTTP/1.1" 200 26624 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" "http://forum.computerbetrug.de"
218.240.13.108 - - [23/May/2008:16:45:49 +0200] "POST /profile.php?do=updatesignature HTTP/1.1" 200 26933 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)" "http://forum.computerbetrug.de/profile.php?do=editsignature"
Probably they got a hook into that MD5-Checksum/Hash of the images (I guess this is a MD5-Checksum). MD5 is quite outdated in some ways. I would propose to change to SHA1 for testing purposes. I am willing to join some tests.
Please Jelsoft-programmers have a look at this issue. I guess there is some trouble ahead that needs to be avoided...
Leave a comment:
-
http://www.parkansky.com/china.htm
http://www.blockacountry.com/
I have also got a couple of chinaaccounts, and I have a non english forum.
beijmanli [email protected]
lovebeijgo [email protected]
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Suri.CMS View PostHow do you block a specific country ?
Can you please elaborate ?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Suri.CMS View PostHow do you block a specific country ?
Can you please elaborate ?
http://www.apnic.net/db/ranges.html
Start with 58.17.*.* and 222.176. to 222.183.
Leave a comment:
-
I've blocked China in htaccess. That seems to do the trick.
Can you please elaborate ?
Leave a comment:
-
I have disabled reCAPTCHA as its very hard to read. I need to do something here. Im going to check out IS Bot when I get home.
Leave a comment:
-
i have to ask, I have been making a list in vBulletin for blocked IP's, is it a problem if one gets listed twice? I cant go through the whole list and double check...
Leave a comment:
-
I would like to block all Chinese IP's how would I do that? This spam is rediculous, and more than that I hate WOW and all these spammers are those Chinese Farmers I always hear people at work babbling about.
Leave a comment:
-
I have these beji members successfully registering too. I also have a track visitors mod on my 3.7 forum and it shows new registrations, but they don't show up in the members list, and vBulletin says the username was not recognized, so ReCaptcha is doing its job for the most part except for these Chinese people...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by nibb View PostI suppose another person with a non english forum that has Q&A setting on can confirm this?
Leave a comment:
-
Seems to work on 3.7, though I'd imagine if a lot of people used it the bots would put a time delay in.
I've blocked China in htaccess. That seems to do the trick.
Leave a comment:
widgetinstance 262 (Related Topics) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
Leave a comment: