Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The gap between my needs and perceived direction of your development

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Deimos
    replied
    Originally posted by Wayne Luke View Post
    Anyway, doesn't really matter what I say. All you want to do is bash the company, product and people.
    When a company releases a product touted as the "Most powerful in the world" and the "premier platform to build on" and it's an inferior product compared to most, if not all products out there like it, then hell yes I'm going to bash it.

    I'm sorry, but it's frustrating having used VB for 10-11 years, only for it to be dumped into the state it's in, ever since IB took over and changed things around.

    If you don't want people bashing the product, then perhaps IB shouldn't be releasing such inferior, poorly made products and claiming them to be the best, it's insulting not only to the VB brand, but to customers who've used and recommended VB for so long.

    And yes, I did recommend VB4, when it reached 4.2, but will no longer do so, given that the same mistakes, if not more, are being made with VB5.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wayne Luke
    replied
    Products should have an anticipated 18 - 24 month life cycle. That is all I know.

    Leave a comment:


  • slinky
    replied
    Originally posted by Wayne Luke View Post
    Actually it was forked from vBulletin 4.1.5. vBulletin 4.1.5 was released on July 11th, 2011. So it hasn't been two years of actual development. Before that there would have been planning for wireframes, migration, etc...

    However like I said, it was intended to be a 100% rewrite, the post would be more problematic but it wasn't intended to be so. Maybe 5.1 or 5.2 but not 5.0.

    Anyway, doesn't really matter what I say. All you want to do is bash the company, product and people.
    I haven't seen him bash the people at all. With regard to the product and the company, it is what it is. The company started working on it's next product when vBulletin was only at VB 4.1.5. That's practically right out of the starting gate. Why is that?

    Leave a comment:


  • Wayne Luke
    replied
    Originally posted by Deimos View Post
    Something that probably should've been done before releasing any form of beta, let alone putting it up for sale.
    It's been a work in progress for presumably 2+ years, in all that time, very little seems to have been done and given the review linked above and various comments from professional coders here and elsewhere, it seems those 2 years have been a bit of a waste, to put it mildly.
    Actually it was forked from vBulletin 4.1.5. vBulletin 4.1.5 was released on July 11th, 2011. So it hasn't been two years of actual development. Before that there would have been planning for wireframes, migration, etc...

    However like I said, it was intended to be a 100% rewrite, the post would be more problematic but it wasn't intended to be so. Maybe 5.1 or 5.2 but not 5.0.

    Anyway, doesn't really matter what I say. All you want to do is bash the company, product and people.

    Leave a comment:


  • Deimos
    replied
    Originally posted by Wayne Luke View Post
    The link would be more condemning if we ever said vBulletin 5 was a complete rewrite. It isn't and a lot of legacy code is maintained to maintain legacy structures. As more is rewritten more legacy code will be updated and other structures updated.
    Something that probably should've been done before releasing any form of beta, let alone putting it up for sale.
    It's been a work in progress for presumably 2+ years, in all that time, very little seems to have been done and given the review linked above and various comments from professional coders here and elsewhere, it seems those 2 years have been a bit of a waste, to put it mildly.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wayne Luke
    replied
    Originally posted by Deimos View Post
    Yea, but is anyone really surprised? I mean really?
    The link would be more condemning if we ever said vBulletin 5 was a complete rewrite. It isn't and a lot of legacy code is maintained to maintain legacy structures. As more is rewritten more legacy code will be updated and other structures updated.

    Leave a comment:


  • Deimos
    replied
    Yea, but is anyone really surprised? I mean really?

    Leave a comment:


  • janslu
    replied
    Thanks for the link. Doesn't make me any happier...

    Leave a comment:


  • g00gl3r
    replied
    This? - http://adminextra.com/threads/connec...e-4#post-52885

    Leave a comment:


  • Lizard King
    replied
    Originally posted by s.molinari View Post
    Do you mean rafio's post? Very sad indeed.

    Scott
    Yes , i still can't believe how things ended regarding vBulletin 5. I have mix feelings . I am happy that i left vBSEO because i don't have to code anything for a disaster project like this. However i am sad because an amazing product we all admired vBulletin is slowly dying each other day.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lizard King
    replied
    Scott just read the code review on Adminextra , you'll be more surprised.

    Leave a comment:


  • janslu
    replied
    @Zachery - my sincere thank you for reading and responding even though my topic has wandered into devs personals. It wasn't my intention. I just want to reiterate - please remember about existing, successful communities without big expense budgets. We need to upgrade primarily for new frontends - html5, less nesting, css sprites instead of multiple static requests etc. But we also need to have our sites working better or more or less equal than vb4 on the same hardware. Our users like what we currently have - they just want to have a nicer and faster website. Therefore the prime metrics I will use when deciding whether to upgrade are:
    - server load (including search!),
    - page load time (this delayed redraw is a little scary),
    - enhancements for current features - like blogs (they are horrible in vb4) and social groups (they need some polish and need to be available on mobiles)
    - upgrades for popular mods - like vbseo, but these should be coming if you will make a popular product,
    - lastly - new features

    I really hope you guys will deliver. But if not - than I'm in for some really tough decisions...

    Leave a comment:


  • Zachery
    replied
    I actually honestly don't know who did the CMS development during the alpha/beta project.

    Anyway, as for Zoltan, he is doing vB5 dev work.

    Leave a comment:


  • rexxxy
    replied
    They don't want to say which developer is working on vb5 cms. Maybe Edwin is working on it again?

    Talking about search what happen to Zoltan search for VB4 that he was testing out on IB Site/Sites?

    Leave a comment:


  • Deimos
    replied
    Originally posted by Zachery View Post
    Before you run around making things up, can you cite a source?

    Parts of the team who developed/design vBulletin 4, are no longer with us, parts of the team who did develop vBulletin 4 are with us, and some of them are working on vBulletin 5.
    I don't remember WHO said it, I just remember one of the staff saying members who had worked on VB4's CMS, are now working on VB5

    You yourself just said SOME of them are working on VB5, so why would I need to go find the post I'm referring to? Which, given the ****ty nature of VBs search "feature", would take an age anyways.

    Are SOME of the people who worked on VB4's cms, now working on VB5? yes or no?

    Not from Staff, but Digitalpoint made this remark sometime back - https://www.vbulletin.com/forum/show...=1#post2321239
    Last edited by Deimos; Mon 24th Sep '12, 8:16am.

    Leave a comment:

Related Topics

Collapse

Working...
X