Server Load Avergas 24.26??? Anybody else with GoDaddy?

[logicola]

members on here are guaranteed to be greeted with either a link to hostican or paracast or both.

ROFL!!!!

I wish to have customers as loyal as Gene!

[Gene Steinberg]

ROFL!!!!

I wish to have customers as loyal as Gene!

Well, not really. Besides, I thought this was a thread designed to talk about alternatives to GoDaddy. What's yours?

Peace,
Gene

[logicola]

I am not satisfied with GoDaddy and looking for a change. I have switched to many hosts and left. Currently testing several hosting providers, one of them being HostIcan! Your fav .. I have my empty vb forum installed on it and Hostican for testing. sometimes takes me 6 - 7 sec to fully load a page. and I found your site, hosted on Hostican, not that fast too...

[Gene Steinberg]

I am not satisfied with GoDaddy and looking for a change. I have switched to many hosts and left. Currently testing several hosting providers, one of them being HostIcan! Your fav .. I have my empty vb forum installed on it and Hostican for testing. sometimes takes me 6 - 7 sec to fully load a page. and I found your site, hosted on Hostican, not that fast too...

I'm surprised. My sites load in less than a second, routinely. My Host-Tracker logs, which use 30 access points from around the world, indicate the same. In fact, the ones I just checked showed a range of from .1 second to .2 second on the four sites they track for me.

Maybe you should run a Traceroute and see if there's a hang-up between you, your ISP and the HostICan servers, and regardless, maybe write them and see if they can help you figure out where the hangup might be.

Here are mine:

www.macnightowl.com
www.theparacast.com (this is the one that has my vBulletin forum at /forums)
www.techbroadcasting.com
www.rockoids.com

Would you care to publicize your site so I can check it too? Or send it to me via PM?

Peace,
Gene

[lnxcode]

I am not satisfied with GoDaddy and looking for a change. I have switched to many hosts and left. Currently testing several hosting providers, one of them being HostIcan! Your fav .. I have my empty vb forum installed on it and Hostican for testing. sometimes takes me 6 - 7 sec to fully load a page. and I found your site, hosted on Hostican, not that fast too...

Here we go again... What is your domain? What is your Ticket ID? -- are you unable to answer a simple question?

Let's just end it here. We can't help someone who doesn't want to work with us.

[logicola]

Here we go again... What is your domain? What is your Ticket ID? -- are you unable to answer a simple question?

Let's just end it here. We can't help someone who doesn't want to work with us.

I have sent you a PM. PLEASE handle this problem professionally. I have NEVER heard of a staff in any professional company would argue with a customer! It's an eye opener!

vBulletin.com is a big board and many potential customers are watching. You are constantly challenging me ( in other threads) if I am a real customer! or a troll having nothing to do and spreading out bad words about HostIcan all over the place. Sorry. I didn't pay enough to deserve a good customer service. Live and learn.

[lnxcode]

We accidentally found your account finally, after about 2 hours of searching. You're site runs fine from: England, Moscow, United States, Japan. Since we have peering agreements in all locations mentioned above (multiple agreements) we can track the loading speed, site content, and your account for any location we have a connection.

Ok, so we have found that your domain is: <domain removed> -- Does anyone else say that it loads slow?

1. There is no support ticket for your domain, did you even add one?

If you have a problem still, I highly suggest doing a traceroute, you can do it from dnsstuff.com or from your PC.

[zanack]

Is it appropriate for a hosting company to add someone's domain name to their post when clearly the client used the PM system for this? I sincerely hope that nobody responds to the request by the host for reports on loading speed.

[Gene Steinberg]

Is it appropriate for a hosting company to add someone's domain name to their post when clearly the client used the PM system for this? I sincerely hope that nobody responds to the request by the host for reports on loading speed.

I notice that the site in question isn't even hosted by HostICan, if you can accept the current WHOIS info as correct. So this really is strange, don't you think?

Peace,
Gene

[lnxcode]

Is it appropriate for a hosting company to add someone's domain name to their post when clearly the client used the PM system for this? I sincerely hope that nobody responds to the request by the host for reports on loading speed.

Care to take a look at the whois on this IP range?

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6000]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\Users\lnxcode>ping <domain removed>

Pinging <domain removed> [208.109.78.124] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 208.109.78.124: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=48
Reply from 208.109.78.124: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=48
Reply from 208.109.78.124: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=48
Reply from 208.109.78.124: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 208.109.78.124:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 77ms, Maximum = 79ms, Average = 77ms

C:\Users\lnxcode>

[Gene Steinberg]

Care to take a look at the whois on this IP range?

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6000]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\Users\lnxcode>ping <domain removed>

Pinging <domain removed> [208.109.78.124] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 208.109.78.124: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=48
Reply from 208.109.78.124: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=48
Reply from 208.109.78.124: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=48
Reply from 208.109.78.124: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 208.109.78.124:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 77ms, Maximum = 79ms, Average = 77ms

C:\Users\lnxcode>

OK, I get:

124.78.109.208.in-addr.arpa. 3599 IN PTR linhostjava24.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net.

That's a GoDaddy server.

In other words, we're dealing with a fake claim here, clearly! How should a host respond to people to present false reports of service problems? That's the real issue here.

Peace,
Gene

[zanack]

No, I don't care to take a look at these figures. I'm not interested. Bottom line for me is that you, as a host, have decided to put up someone's domain name who had chosen to PM you. This should be private!

[logicola]

I have said it earlier in PM I have yet to move my domain from GOdaddy to HostIcan . and I am transfering file over there. I have run a empty vb to test the speed over hostican. Godday server has no problem in server speed as I have said it earlier.

My account over HOstican got suspended for no reason !!

[Gene Steinberg]

I have said it earlier in PM I have yet to move my domain from GOdaddy to HostIcan . and I am transfering file over there. I have run a empty vb to test the speed over hostican. Godday server has no problem in server speed as I have said it earlier.

My account over HOstican got suspended for no reason !!

Which means, of course, that your claim that HostICan had slow performance with your message board wasn't true. You never actually ran your full site over there, yet you posted complaints under two different names and, apparently, never told HostICan about your alleged problems other than in a public message board.

I just wonder why people pull stunts like that in other to trash a company for no reason. This isn't a playground. I take my vBulletin forum and my sites very seriously. I pay hard-earned money for the services I receive, and when I recommend anyone, it's because of a positive personal experience not for any real or imagined kickbacks.

Those who know me personally, and my reputation as a long-time technology journalist, will attest to the same.

Peace,
Gene

[lnxcode]

The customer provided inaccurate data to the company, when we tried to also verify the phone number on the account it was inactive, we were left no choice but to cancel and refund the account.